Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Wiliam examines prominent school-improvement proposals by asking not only whether an intervention can work, but how large its likely effect is, what it costs, whether it can scale, and what must be displaced to implement it. He argues that familiar policies—recruiting supposedly smarter teachers, dismissing weaker teachers, performance pay, smaller classes, copying high-performing systems, and expanding school choice—offer limited or impractical routes to system-wide gains when these constraints are considered.
His preferred priorities are a coherent, knowledge-rich curriculum and sustained improvement of the teachers already working in schools. Curriculum matters because knowledge supports later thinking and cumulative learning; teacher development matters because instructional expertise can continue growing throughout a career. The book advocates school-based professional learning that is gradual, choice-sensitive, evidence-informed, and supported by peers, rather than one-off training. It is an argumentative synthesis focused substantially on the United States, not a trial comparing a complete reform package.
Leaders can apply its decision framework by comparing opportunity costs, feasibility, and expected impact, protecting curricular coherence, and creating routines in which every teacher deliberately improves practice over time.
View or buy the cited work >>Read a similar article free online >>
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway