Where it is used
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
The evidence behind the series
Browse the scientific research and professional literature used across all seven volumes of The Science of Learning for Educators.
Search the collection
Choose an author range, search a title or concept, or narrow the collection by source type. Open any result to see where it appears in the books, read its evidence summary and follow available source links.
1 reference
Yang and colleagues synthesise classroom evidence for retrieval practice rather than relying only on laboratory studies. The meta-analysis includes 222 independent studies and data from 48,478 learners.
Across comparisons, testing or quizzing produced a medium average improvement in academic achievement over restudy and other control activities (Hedges’ g = 0.499). Effects varied with the comparison strategy, match between practice and final-test formats and materials, corrective feedback, number of retrieval opportunities, timing and location, intervention duration, and research design. The authors find results compatible with additional exposure, transfer-appropriate processing, and motivational accounts; the analysis does not establish that one mechanism explains every effect. The pooled estimate also should not be read as a guaranteed effect for any quiz implementation, because included studies and conditions were heterogeneous.
For educators, retrieval should be low stakes and aligned with important knowledge, repeated over time, followed by corrective information, and used to guide learning rather than merely assign grades. Comparing retrieval with a credible alternative and monitoring delayed learning provide more meaningful evidence than immediate quiz performance alone.
A transparent research trail
Each entry identifies the volume, edition, chapter or appendix in which the work appears.
Evidence summaries explain the central idea and why the source matters to educators.
Entries link to lawful full text where available, or to a publisher, library or purchase page.
References are checked against publisher records, scholarly indexes, DOI or ISBN metadata, repositories and author records where available. An entry marked [Citation not verified] preserves the wording found in the relevant volume without attributing findings to an unconfirmed work.
From sources to a coherent pathway